Combating False Allegations & Weaponized Protective Orders: Unsubstantiated domestic violence and abuse allegations are frequently weaponized in child custody disputes to secure tactical possession advantages and exclude fit parents from their homes without notice. Procedural due process requires immediate evidentiary hearings, cross-examination, and strict scrutiny before a court may deprive a fit parent of fundamental custody rights based on uncorroborated, self-serving claims (Greene v. McElroy, 360 U.S. 474).
Parental Presumption
How many times has CPS stormed into someone’s life and then told them that they had to do exactly as they were told? How many were told that they had to attend some sort of counseling or rehabilitative parenting type of program or had a looming threat of loss of your child? And all because a social worker might not agree with the decisions that you were making!
Q:How many courts have been using child affidavits, letters, and testimony from within their chambers to deprive that child of that parent’s authority and time?
A:“[s]imply because the decision of a parent is not agreeable to a child or because it involves risks does not automatically transfer the power to make that decision from the parents to some agency or officer of the state.” Id. at 603, 99 S.Ct. 2493 (emphasis added). Thus, except in special circumstances, the state normally must defer to the exercise of a broad degree of parental discretion.
Schleifer By Schleifer v. City of Charlottesville, 159 F. 3d 843 – Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit 1998
[much above is from dissent.]