Because getting divorced should not mean losing your child
Divorce court judges who deny a child's right to free and equal association with both fit parents are acting in the divorce court's best interests not the child's.
Educational Strategy Review
Discuss this topic in a private educational consulting session
Private consultation session with Ron Palmer to analyze fundamental liberty principles and self-advocacy strategy.
⚖️Constitutional Legal Standard & Parental Liberty Foundation
Fix Family Courts provides parents, attorneys, and family advocates with rigorous constitutional frameworks to safeguard fundamental parental rights. Under binding Supreme Court precedents including Troxel v. Granville, Santosky v. Kramer, and Pierce v. Society of Sisters, fit parents are constitutionally presumed to act in their children's best interests. State courts lack constitutional authority to abridge custody, parenting time, or parental decision-making without strict scrutiny and clear and convincing evidence.
Author, Systems Architect & Constitutional Researcher
Author of "Not in the Best Interest of the Child" and "Oath Breakers". Systems optimization expert applying formal logic, Fortune 50 enterprise architecture, and the State Action Doctrine to expose constitutional defects in family court proceedings.