Constitutional Motion Practice & Evidentiary Due Process in Family Court: Procedural due process guarantees litigating parents the right to timely notice, an impartial tribunal, formal evidentiary hearings, and the cross-examination of adverse witnesses before parental liberties are infringed (Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545). Filing timely constitutional objections and modular pre-trial motions prevents domestic relations courts from deciding fundamental custody rights through informal conferences, judicial fiats, or unsworn hearsay recommendations.
This Bill, HB0153, sponsored by House Representative Mark Jennings, is just waiting for the President of the Senate and then the Governor to sign. Once that is done, this bill goes into effect on July 1, 2017.
Parental rights receive protection in Wyoming.
Fix Family Courts provides parents, attorneys, and family advocates with rigorous constitutional frameworks to safeguard fundamental parental rights. Under binding Supreme Court precedents including Troxel v. Granville, Santosky v. Kramer, and Pierce v. Society of Sisters, fit parents are constitutionally presumed to act in their children's best interests. State courts lack constitutional authority to abridge custody, parenting time, or parental decision-making without strict scrutiny and clear and convincing evidence.
Related Educational Guides & Authorities
Continue exploring constitutional principles, case law precedents, and procedural strategies.
Parental Rights rally Florida 2014
Learn how fit parents protect fundamental parental rights in custody hearings. Assert Fourteenth Amendment due...
Wyoming has a Proposed Parental Rights Bill that could end parental alienation and legal abuse!
Combating parental alienation requires evidentiary precision and rapid constitutional enforcement rather than...
Letter to House and Senate Representatives on Equal Parental Rights
Learn how fit parents protect fundamental parental rights in custody hearings. Assert Fourteenth Amendment due...